Alco Drinks v. The Municipal Corporation Of City Of Pune And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5098 OF 2010 Neelam Wines WRIT PETITION NO. 5024 OF 2010 Gems Wines WRIT PETITION NO. 5023 OF 2010 Pushkar Wines WRIT PETITION NO. 5022 OF 2010 Kunal Wines WRIT PETITION NO. 5274 OF 2010 Kohinoor Wines Kiran Kawre 1/4

WRIT PETITION NO. 5273 OF 2010 Modern Wines WRIT PETITION NO. 5271 OF 2010 Crystal Wines WRIT PETITION NO. 5097 OF 2010 Mahesh Wines WRIT PETITION NO. 5270 OF 2010 Alco Drinks WRIT PETITION NO. 5122 OF 2010 Deepak Wines Kiran Kawre 2/4

WRIT PETITION NO. 5123 OF 2010 Pratap Wines WRIT PETITION NO. 5269 OF 2010 Golden Wines ----- None for the Petitioner.

Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni a/w Mr. Gourav Shahane, Mr. Krishna Jaybhay and Ms. Sweta Shah, for Respondent No.1 to 3/Pune Municipal Corporation. Mr. P. P. Kakade, G. P. a/w. Smt N.M. Mehra, AGPfor the Respondent/State. ----- C0RAM : G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA,JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 05, 2024 PC :

1.

Learned Government Pleader, Appellate Side had circulated with the Registry a list of old infructuous matters so that these matters could be listed and disposed of as infructuous. These petitions are also in the list. This list of infructuous matters was notified by the office by its notice dated 25 January 2024, by which the parties/advocates were intimated that if the proceedings have not become infructuous, then a praecipe be submitted in the office before its listing stating that the matter needs to be adjudicated. Accordingly, Kiran Kawre 3/4

after such prior notice, these matters are listed today before this Court. No praecipe has been received on behalf of the petitioners or the advocate for the petitioners stating that something would survive for adjudication in these petitions.

Even when these petitions were called out, none appears for the petitioners. It, therefore, appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute these petitions and/or they have become infructuous. These petitions are, accordingly, disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioners to revive these petitions, in the event, the petitioners feels that the cause of action still survive.

4.

Disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

5.

Civil Application, if any, also stands disposed of. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA,J) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Kiran Kawre 4/4