Madhubala W/O Vishwanath Pune v. Sonopanth Dandekar Shikshan Mandali, Palghar, Through Secretary And ORS

dgm 1 production 1- wp-5272-12.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5272 OF 2012 Madhubala w/o Vishwanath Pune .... Petitioner vs Sonopnath Dandekar Shikshan Mandli Palghar, through Secretary and ors..... Respondents Mr. D.G. Dhanure for the petitioner.

Mr. S.B. Shetye for respondents 1 and 2.

Mr.V.N. Sagare, AGP for respondent No.3production 2- caw2643-14.

CORAM:

ANOOP V. MOHTA AND K. R. SHRIRAM, JJ.

DATE : April 29, 2015 P.C.:

Parties have arrived at settlement and signed the Consent Terms (marked X) so also by the respective Advocates. The statement is made that there is no issue with regard to the signature and authorisation. The petitioner is present in Court today. The consent terms are well within the frame work of law and the record.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of consent terms.

Rule made absolute accordingly. No costs.

(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) 1/1