Bank Of Maharashtra v. Satish Keshavrao Ganorkar

CAW. 1657-14 VPH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1657 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION No. 1881 OF 2014 Bank of Maharashtra ...

Applicant / Petitioner Vs.

Satish Keshavrao Ganorkar ...

Respondents *** Mr. Sadanand Shetty i/b Mrs. Rathina Maravarmar, for the Applicant / Petitioner.

None for Respondents.

*** CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 22, 2015 PC.

.

A request made by the Applicant for leave to amend the petition is declined. The contention of the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant that merely because order of DRAT is challenged, it is necessary to add DRAT as party-respondent, is without any substance. Liberty, however, is granted to the Petitioner to add "Union of India" as party-respondent. Amendment to be carried out within 2 weeks. Civil application is, accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Sd/- Sd/- [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.] Vinayak Halemath 1 / 1