Shri. Pralhad Krishunaji Parchandrao v. Shri. Yetala Damu Gaikwad And ANR

34.5893.13-wp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5893/2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. N. P. Dalvi for the petitioner Mr. Hamid D. Mulla for the respondent CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATE : JUNE 16, 2016 P.C.:

1.

Heard. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner defendant No.2 challenges the order dated 18.02.2013 passed by the Jt. Civil Judge, Senior Division Pandharpur below Exhibit- 63 in Regular Civil Suit No.104/2012 rejecting the application made by defendant No.2 for condonation of delay in filing the written statement.

2.

The learned counsel for the respondent No.1 - plaintiff, after taking instructions from his clients makes a statement that Regular Civil Suit No.140/2012 has already been decided on merits. Hence, nothing survives in the Writ Petition. Basavraj G Patil 1/2

34.5893.13-wp 3.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondent plaintiff, Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGE Basavraj G Patil 2/2