Narendra Hari Patil v. Moreshwar Hari Patil

Rane * 1/2 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1023 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 277 OF 2014 Narendra Hari Patil ....Applicant (Orig. Appellant/Plaintiff) V/s.

Moreshwar Hari Patil ....Respondent (Orig. Defendant) * * * * * Mr. Subhash Jha i/by. Law Global, Advocate for the Appellant/Applicant.

Mr. Manish Jain i/by. S.M. Jain & Associates, Advocate for the Respondents.

Coram :- N.M. Jamdar, J.

Date :- 21 April 2017.

P.C. :- None of the reasons given in the Civil Application are cogent as various facilities have been provided by this Court to the Advocates and litigants to track the progress of the matter. However, since the learned Counsel for the applicant has tendered

Rane * 2/2 * an unconditional apology, for the lapse of the advocate the litigant should not suffer, which will happen in this case if the order is not recalled, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Place the Second Appeal on board as per the CMIS date. (N.M. Jamdar, J)