Nirmala Laxman Mudgan v. State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Rural Deve. And Water Conservation Dept. And ANR.

ssm 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5424 OF 2015 Bebi Bansilal Kokni ....Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5425 OF 2015 Nirmala Laxman Mudgan ....Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5426 OF 2015 Sunanda Jayram Bhoye ....Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6176 OF 2015 Nilesh Manik Ghume ....Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6177 OF 2015 Tukaram Uttamrao Jagtap ....Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6178 OF 2015 1/3

ssm 2 Rekha Kisanrao Patil ....Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6179 OF 2015 Kiran Daga Patil ....Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents.

Mr. A.R. Kapadnis for the Petitioner/s in all matters. Mr. C.P. Yadav, AGP for Respondent No.1 in all matters. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ.

DATE : 10 JULY 2015.

P.C.:- Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

In view of earlier order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 204 of 2015 and other connected matters, dated 21 January 2015, we are inclined to dispose of all these Writ Petitions, as the statement is made that the case of the Petitioner/s is/are similarly situated.

All the Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of with direction to Respondent No.2-Zilla Parishad to consider and decide the 2/3

ssm 3 proposal of the Petitioner/s in terms of the Government Resolution dated 29 September 2011, if any other Resolution which is in force, as early as possible, in accordance with law, positively within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order. All the Petitions are accordingly disposed of. Rule, disposed of accordingly.

There shall be no order as to costs.

The parties to act on the basis of an authenticated copy of this order.

(V.L. ACHLIYA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) 3/3