Surekha Prakash Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

appln.338.16.11.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 338 OF 2016 (For Delay Condonation) IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2016 Surekha Prakash Kamble ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Virendra V. Pethe for the Applicant Mr. H. J. Dedia, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1-State Mr. Amit A. Karande for the Respondent No. 2 CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

MONDAY, 20 th MARCH, 2017 P.C.

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.

2.

By this application, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 66 days caused in filing the aforesaid application seeking leave to file appeal.

SQ Pathan 1/2

appln.338.16.11.doc 3.

Learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant had filed a Revision Application in this Court being Revision Application No. 10 of 2016. He submits that the said application was disposed of as withdrawn and liberty was granted to file a substantive appeal, as the remedy was by way of an appeal against the order of acquittal. 4.

Learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2 opposed the application. However, for the reasons set out in the application, the applicant has made out sufficient cause for condoning the delay of 66 days caused in filing the aforesaid application seeking leave to file appeal. Application is allowed and the dealy is condoned. 5.

Application disposed of accordingly.

6.

Registry to number the application seeking leave to file appeal and place the same for admission on 3rd April, 2017. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2