← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6036/2017rule discharged

Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited And ORS. v. Avadhut Krishnarao Kharde And ANR.

2017-06-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.K. Tahilramani2 pages

* 1/2 * 10-WP-6036-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6036 OF 2017 Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited & Ors.

......Petitioners V/s.

Avadhut Krishnarao Kharde & Anr.

.......Respondents Mrs. Neeta V. Masurkar, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. Nikhil M. Pujari, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM :

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :

DATE :

14th th June, 2017.

June, 2017.

P.C. :

P.C. :

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. the learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Rule.

Rule.

By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith and the matter is heard finally.

and the matter is heard finally.

This Petition is mainly directed against an interim This Petition is mainly directed against an interim order dated 5.5.2017 passed by the Central Administrative order dated 5.5.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. By the said order, transfer of the Respondents who are Tribunal. By the said order, transfer of the Respondents who are working as Sub-Divisional Engineers in Bharat Sanchar Nigam working as Sub-Divisional Engineers in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Pune to Beed and Dhule was stayed and certain other Limited, Pune to Beed and Dhule was stayed and certain other Shivgan

* 2/2 * 10-WP-6036-2017.doc directions were passed.

directions were passed.

In view of the fact that it is an interim order, we are In view of the fact that it is an interim order, we are not inclined to interfere in the same. However, we are inclined not inclined to interfere in the same. However, we are inclined to request the Central Administrative Tribunal to dispose of the to request the Central Administrative Tribunal to dispose of the Original Application preferred by the Respondents within a Original Application preferred by the Respondents within a period of six weeks.

period of six weeks.

Accordingly, request is made to the Tribunal to Accordingly, request is made to the Tribunal to dispose of the Original Applications within a period of six weeks dispose of the Original Applications within a period of six weeks from the date of the communication of this order. from the date of the communication of this order. As we are not inclined to interfere in the interim As we are not inclined to interfere in the interim order, rule is discharged.

order, rule is discharged.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J) Shivgan