The State Of Maharashtra v. Ananda Manku Patil And ORS.

ssm 1 19-appln269.18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 269 OF 2018 The State of Maharashtra .....Applicant Vs.

Ananda Manku Patil & Ors.

....Respondents.

Ms. P.P. Shinde, APP for the Applicant.

Mr. Anand S. Patil for Respondent Nos. 3 to 7. CORAM : A. S. OKA, AND A. S. GADKARI, JJ.

DATE : 25th FEBRUARY, 2019.

P.C.:- Heard the learned APP for the Applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 7. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 7 has opposed the Application.

A sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay of 30 days. Hence, the rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.S. GADKARI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.) 1/1