The State Of Maharashtra v. Prakash Vishwas Patil

1 / 2 920-APEAL-546-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.546 OF 2018 The State of Maharashtra .... Applellant versus Prakash Vishwas Patil ... Respondent .......

• Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh, Advocate for the State/Appellant. • None for the Respondent.

CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 15th JUNE, 2018.

P.C. :

1.

Heard the learned Addl. P.P. Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh for the State.

2.

The learned Addl. P.P. submits that the learned Trial Judge has grossly erred in releasing the Accused No.7 on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- with one surety in the like amount, who has been convicted for the offence punishable u/s 324 of IPC.

Nesarikar

2 / 2 920-APEAL-546-18.odt 3.

The perusal of the Judgment impugned reveal that in paragraph No.92 the learned Trial Judge has given sound and cogent reasons as to why he found it necessary to give benefit of Probation of Offender's Act, to the present Respondent i.e. accused No.7. No perversity is noticed in the findings of the learned Trial Judge to warrant interference. The Appeal is therefore rejected.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (B. R. GAVAI, J.)