Suraj Bhagela Gaud v. The State Of Maharashtra

DAE 1 20-WP-5993-2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5993 OF 2021 Suraj Bhagela Gaud

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Avinash A. Naik, Appointed Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for Respondent-State.

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND by DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE Date: 2022.11.30 09:47:49 +0530 DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ.

DATE : 24th NOVEMBER, 2022.

P.C.:- .

The prayer of the Petitioner that, he may be granted permission to die (euthanasia) cannot be entertained in the eyes of law. The threats extended by the Petitioner that, if his Application is not taken up for hearing, he will commit suicide/die can also not be entertained. 2.

Petition is wholly misconceived and is accordingly dismissed in limine.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.) 1/1