Imtiyaz Jafar Nadaf v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

35-wp-2718-21.doc by CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Date: 2021.08.12 10:22:47 +0530 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2718 OF 2021 Imtiyaz Jafar Nadaf ] Petitioner Vs.

The State of Mahrashtra ] & Ors.

] Respondents.

...

Shailesh Chavan i/b Milind Deshmukh for petitioner. Mr.V. S. Gokhale, 'B' Panel AGP for State.

...

CORAM : K.K. TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.

DATE : 10th AUGUST, 2021.

P.C.

1.

Heard learned Counsel for parties.

2.

Learned Advocate Mr.Shailesh Chavan for petitioner submits that he received instructions from his client to withdraw the petition as same has become infructuous. Same is permitted. To that effect, learned Advocate has given in writing. Same is taken on record and marked Exh.X' for identification. Same is accepted. Hence, following order is passed.

Chitra Sonawane

35-wp-2718-21.doc a) Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

b) No order as to costs.

[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [K. K. TATED, J.] Chitra Sonawane