Hariprasad Ram Ashare Tiwari v. Rajendra Prasad R Tiwari And ANR.

IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL Date: 2021.09.02 17:14:12 +0530 IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL 20.9511.19 WP sp.doc ISM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9511 OF 2019 HARIPRASAD RAM ASHARE TIWARI ....PETITIONER V/s.

RAJENDRA PRASAD R TIWARI .....RESPONDENTS AND ANR Mr. T. J. Mendon for the petitioner CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE:

AUGUST 26, 2021.

P.C.:

1] Though served, none appears for respondent no. 2-Insurance Company. As such, contentions in the petition are not controverted. That being so, Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause 8 (a) which reads thus:

"(a) That by issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order the impugned order dated 16.01.2019 passed by the Learned Commissioner for Employees Compensation at Mumbai below Exhibit 0-5 in condonation of delay Order corrected pursuant to speaking to minutes order dated 02//09/2021. 1/2

20.9511.19 WP sp.doc application No. ECA 17 of 2017 be quashed and set aside and delay in fling the said application be condoned."

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] Order corrected pursuant to speaking to minutes order dated 02//09/2021. 2/2