Ravi Kaluram Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra

Nisha S.

Chitnis Nisha S. Chitnis Date: 2021.01.14 12:50:21 +0530 1/2 27-ba.1253.1390&2439.2018.doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1253 OF 2017 Ravi Kaluram Gaikwad ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1390 OF 2018 Naresh Jairam Shetty ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2439 OF 2018 Chotelal L. Jaiswal @Raju ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Karl P. Rustomkhan i/b Mr. Rahul Arote, for the Applicant in BA/1253/2017.

Ms. Gunjan Thakkar, for the Applicant in BA/1390/2018. None for the Applicant in BA/2439/2018.

Mr. A. R. Patil, A.P.P for the Respondent - State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2021 P.C. :

1.

It appears that the trial of the applicants has commenced and that 21 witnesses have been examined till date and a few more witnesses

2/2 27-ba.1253.1390&2439.2018.doc are left to be examined. The applicants are languishing in jail since 2016. 2.

Since the trial of the applicants has already commenced and 21 witnesses are examined till date, it would be appropriate to direct the trial Court to expedite the case of the applicants and to conclude the same, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within 6 months from the date of receipt of this order. Order accordingly.

3.

Considering the aforesaid, in particular since 21 witnesses have been examined till date, the aforesaid applications are not considered on merits.

4.

The Applications are disposed of in above terms. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.