← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9354/2017dismissed

The Indian Express Limited v. Mr. Subhash Khimandas Hira And ORS.

2017-09-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.S. Sanklecha2 pages

wp-9354-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9354 OF 2017 The Indian Express Ltd., ..

Petitioner.

v/s.

Mr. Subhash K. Hira & Others ..

Respondents.

Mr. Nitin Deshpande with Mr. Amol Joshi i/b. Poorvi Kamani, for the Petitioner.

Mr. Yashpal Jain with Suprabha Jain and Ms. Harshita Joglekar I/b. Haresh Jagtiani & Associates, for Respondent No.1. Mr. P. M. Arjunwadkar, for Respondent No.3.

CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA, J.

DATE : 25th SEPTEMBER, 2017.

P.C:- This Petition has been moved for urgent reliefs by the Petitioner. Mr. Deshpande states that all the parties have been served. This Petition challenges the order dated 5th April, 2017 passed by the Ad-hoc City Civil Judge at Bombay. By the impugned order, the Respondents; application, seeking permission to file original documents relating to the subject matter of the suit, has been allowed. The impugned order records the fact that the suit as filed by the Plaintiff is for compensation/ damages on account of defamation. The impugned order records that these documents which are being relied upon are documents which are relating to the controversy arising in this suit. The impugned order grants liberty to the Petitioner to file their S.R.JOSHI

wp-9354-2017 documents and does not do away with the necessity of the proving contents of the documents. In the application, the Trial Court had stated that these very documents have been disclosed in their affidavit of documents dated 31st July, 2015.

In the above view, the impugned order has taken a possible view in the facts arising in the present case. Therefore, no interference in my supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is warranted.

Petition dismissed in the above terms. No order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) S.R.JOSHI