← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6324/2018disposed off

Shri Damodar Lutaman Gaud v. State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And Another

2023-10-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram,Hon'Ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale2 pages

1/2 901-WP-6324-18 @ 11-WP-12452-18 @ 12-WP-2413-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

PURTI PRASAD PARAB CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PURTI PRASAD PARAB Date: 2023.10.21 16:21:28 +0530

(901) WRIT PETITION NO. 6324 OF 2018 Damodar Lutaman Gaud ....Petitioner V/s.

State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary and Anr.

...Respondents

AND

(11) WRIT PETITION NO. 12452 OF 2018 Nagendra Tiwari and Ors.

....Petitioners V/s.

State of Maharashtra Through the Principal Secretary and Anr.

...Respondents

AND

(12) WRIT PETITION NO. 2413 OF 2019 Dilip Namdev Patil and Ors.

....Petitioners V/s.

State of Maharashtra Through the Principal Secretary and Anr.

...Respondents

---- Mr. Gaurav Pandey a/w Ms. Dhanalakshmi Iyer and Ms. Ankita Poddar for Petitioners.

Mr. S.H. Kankal, AGP for State-Respondents.

---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

DATED : 19th OCTOBER 2023 P.C. :

1.

After the petitions were heard for some time, Mr. Pandey on instructions sought leave of the court to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file appropriate appeals challenging the impugned orders. Purti Parab

2/2 901-WP-6324-18 @ 11-WP-12452-18 @ 12-WP-2413-19.doc 2.

Keeping open the rights and contentions of petitioners as well as respondents, petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3.

If there has been delay in filing the appeals, the delay is condoned provided the appeals are filed on or before 15th November 2023. 4.

We clarify that we have not made any observations on the merits of the matter. If appeals are filed, respondents may place on record the affidavit in reply filed in these petitions as also any other material they may before the concerned authority.

(NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Purti Parab