← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/3590/2017disposed off

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited Through Legal Manager Mr. Sagar Gangurde v. Kumar Yash Tanaji Vidyasagar And ANR. Through His Next Friend And Mother Mrs.Geeta Tanaji Vidyasaga

2020-02-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka3 pages

ppn 1 2.caf-3567.17 & ors..doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3567 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.15567 OF 2017 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. through Legal Manager Mr.Sagar Gangurde ..

Applicant Vs.

Sunil Vithoba Pawar & Anr.

..

Respondents ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3556 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.15531 OF 2017 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. through Legal Manager Mr.Sagar Gangurde ..

Applicant Vs.

Geeta Tanaji Vidyasagar & Anr.

..

Respondents ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3559 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.15561 OF 2017 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. through Legal Manager Mr.Sagar Gangurde ..

Applicant Vs.

Santosh Dattaram Gurav & Ors.

..

Respondents ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3590 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.15480 OF 2017 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. through Legal Manager Mr.Sagar Gangurde ..

Applicant Vs.

Kumar Yash Tanaji Vidyasagar & Anr.

..

Respondents

ppn 2 2.caf-3567.17 & ors..doc ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3602 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.15488 OF 2017 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. through Legal Manager Mr.Sagar Gangurde ..

Applicant Vs.

Santosh Dattaram Gurav & Ors.

..

Respondents ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1386 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.24564 OF 2014 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. through Legal Manager Mr.Sagar Gangurde ..

Applicant Vs.

Narendra Sunil Mohite & Anr.

..

Respondents --- Mr.Nikhil Mehta i/by M/s.KMC Legal Venture for the applicant. Mr.T.J. Mendon for the respondent no.1 in CAF/3567/2017, CAF/3556/2017, CAF/3590/2017 and for the respondent nos.1 to 4 in CAF/3559/2017 and CAF/3602/2017.

None for the respondents in CAF/1386/2015.

--- CORAM : R.D.DHANUKA, J.

DATE : 18th February 2020 P.C.:

.

Civil Application Nos.1386 of 2015 are not on board, taken on board.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and original claimants. I have perused the averments made in all the civil applications seeking condonation of delay.

ppn 3 2.caf-3567.17 & ors..doc 3.

In my view, delay is sufficiently explained in all the civil applications. All the aforesaid civil applications are accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No order as to costs. R.D.DHANUKA, J.