← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/428/2016

Smt. Latika Lalasaheb Kakade v. Shri Daulat Desai, The Chief Executive Officer And ORS

2017-12-18Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.2 pages

4 cp 42.17 (group).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 42 OF 2017 Suvarna D/o.Dattatraya Sandbhor ....Petitioner versus Mr. Daulat Desai, Chief Executive Officer ....Respondent with CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 424 OF 2016 Shri Sharadkumar Bhaskar Khandekar and ors.

....Petitioners versus Mr. Daulat Desai, Chief Executive Officer and ors. ....Respondents with CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 425 OF 2016 Smt. Jayshree Madhukar Lohkare ....Petitioner versus Mr. Daulat Desai, Chief Executive Officer and ors. ....Respondents with CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 427 OF 2016 Smt. Varsha Nagnath Satpute ....Petitioner versus Mr. Daulat Desai, Chief Executive Officer and ors. ....Respondents with CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 428 OF 2016 Smt. Latika Lalasaheb Kakade ....Petitioner versus Mr. Daulat Desai, Chief Executive Officer and ors. ....Respondents with CONTEMPT PETITION STAMP NO. 3311 OF 2017 Sadhana D/o. Dattatraya Sandbhor ....Petitioner versus Mr. Daulat Desai, Chief Executive Officer ....Respondent None for the petitioners in contempt petition No. 42 of 2017 and contempt petition stamp No.3311 of 2017.

Mr. Shankar M. Katkar, advocate for the petitioners in writ petition Nos. 424, 425, 427 and 428 of 2017.

Mr. N. P. Deshpande, advocate for the Zilla Parishad in contempt petition No.42 of 2017 and contempt petition stamp No.3311 of 2017. Mr. Pankaj Pandey, advocate for the Zilla Parishad in contempt petition Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

4 cp 42.17 (group).doc Nos. 424, 425, 427 and 428 of 2017.

Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

DATE : 18th DECEMBER, 2017.

P. C. :

Respective learned counsel appearing for the Zilla Parishads, on instructions, made a specific statement that the orders of this Court in respect of which contempt is alleged, are now complied. The statement is accepted.

2.

In the light of the statement, the present contempt petitions have been rendered infructuous and the same are disposed off as such. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 2/2