← Library
Bombay High CourtAO/395/2023disposed off

Kashinath Govind Sandvekar v. The Municipal Corporation For Greater Mumbai Thr. Its Designated Officer F/South

2024-02-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha4 pages

Digitally signed by CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Date:

2024.02.28 11:03:34 +0530 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Chitra Sonawane. 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal from Order No.416 of 2023 a/w Interim Application No.7725/2023 In Appeal from Order No. 416/2023 Anant Vishnu Bidwadkar ....

MCGM ....

Respondent.

a/w Interim Application No.17391/2023 In Appeal from Order No. 416/2023 Geeta Bharat Vedant Applicant.

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

Anant Vishnu Bidwadkar ....

MCGM ....

Respondent.

a/w Appeal from Order No.395/2023 a/w Interim Application No.4708/2023 in Appeal from Order No. 395/2023 Kashinath Govind Sandvekar .. Appellant.

Chitra Sonawane. 2 MCGM .. Respondents.

a/w Interim Application No.17390/2023 in Appeal from Order No. 395/2023 Geeta Bharat Vedant Applicant.

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

Kashinath Govind Sandvekar MCGM Respondent.

a/w Appeal from Order No.476/2023 a/w Interim Application No.12901/2023 in Appeal from Order No.476/2023 Amit Ashok Shetye MCGM & Anr.

Respondents.

a/w Appeal from Order No.473/2023 a/w Interim Application No.12898/2023 in Appeal from Order No.473/2023

Chitra Sonawane. 3 Kiran Mangal Salve MCGM & Anr.

Respondents.

Mr CK Tripathi, for appellants in AO 395/2023 & AO 416/2023. Ms Priti Sejal Shah for appellants in AO 473/23 and AO 476/23. Ms Smita V. Tondwalkar for respondent No.1/BMC. Mr Deepan Dixit for respondent No.2 in AO 473/23 and AO 476/23.

Mr Siddhant Sonawane, I/C Asst.Engg (B & F) F/South ward present.

Coram : R. N. Laddha, J.

Date : 27 February 2024.

P.C. :

After hearing the matter for some time, learned Counsel for the parties jointly submitted that these appeals can be disposed of by directing the learned trial court to decide the suits pending before it, in a time bound manner.

2.

In view of this, the learned trial court is requested to expedite the suits and to decide the same within eight months from receipt of this order.

3.

Interim protection granted earlier shall continue to operate till disposal of the suits.

4.

Learned Counsel for the appellants in Appeal from Order No.395/2023 and Appeal from Order No.416 of 2023, on instructions, makes a statement that he will implead the landlord-

Chitra Sonawane. 4 Geeta Bharat Vedant to the suits pending before the learned trial Court within two weeks from today.

5.

In view of this the impugned order stands vacated. 6.

It is made clear that this court has not examined the merits of the matter and all contentions of the parties are left open. 7.

Given the above, the appeals stands disposed of. As a sequel, the pending applications are also disposed of. [ R. N. Laddha, J. ]