Sudharshan Synghal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

8_wp_2327_15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2327 OF 2015 Sudharshan Synghal & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

....

Mr. Lalith B. Nair for the Petitioners.

Mr. Aniket Nikam a/w Vishwabhushan Kamble i/b Jaykar & Partner for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4.

Mr. V.B.K. Deshmukh, APP for Respondent No.1-State. CORAM:-M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.

DATED : -30th JULY, 2015.

P.C.

Order impugned in the present writ petition can be challenged before the Sessions Court. Hence, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition.

2.

The Petitioner shall move the Sessions Court. Delay, if any, caused due to pendency of the present writ petition shall be condoned.

3.

The writ petition is dismissed.

(JUDGE) megha Page No.1 of 1