Manik Ananta Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

* 1/2 * 902-WP-2218-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2218 OF 2017 Manik Ananta Patil ......Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.......Respondents Mr. N.N.Gawankar i/by Manas N. Gawankar, Advocates for Petitioner.

Mr. H.J.Dedia, APP for Respondent-State.

CORAM :

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :

DATE :

14th th June, 2017.

June, 2017.

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Smt. V.K.Tahilramani, J.) : ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Smt. V.K.Tahilramani, J.) : Heard both sides.

Heard both sides.

Rule Rule. By consent, rule is made returnable . By consent, rule is made returnable forthwith and the matter is heard finally.

forthwith and the matter is heard finally.

The Petitioner was released on parole on The Petitioner was released on parole on 23.5.2017 for 30 days. Thereafter, on 3.6.2017, the 23.5.2017 for 30 days. Thereafter, on 3.6.2017, the Petitioner preferred an application for extension of parole Petitioner preferred an application for extension of parole to the Respondent No.3-Divisional Commissioner, Pune to the Respondent No.3-Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune. The only prayer of the Petitioner is that as Division, Pune. The only prayer of the Petitioner is that as his parole is expiring on 22.6.2017, his application for his parole is expiring on 22.6.2017, his application for Shivgan

* 2/2 * 902-WP-2218-2017.doc parole be decided by 22.6.2017.

parole be decided by 22.6.2017.

In view of the facts of this case, prayer is In view of the facts of this case, prayer is reasonable hence, we are inclined to allow the same. The reasonable hence, we are inclined to allow the same. The Respondent No.3- Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Respondent No.3- Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune to decide the application of the Petitioner for Pune to decide the application of the Petitioner for extension of parole by 22.6.2017.

extension of parole by 22.6.2017.

Rule is made absolute in the above terms.

Rule is made absolute in the above terms.

The learned APP as well as the learned counsel The learned APP as well as the learned counsel for the Petitioner to communicate this order to the for the Petitioner to communicate this order to the Respondent No.3- Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Respondent No.3- Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune.

Pune.

Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order.

order.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J) Shivgan