Shri Abdulmannan Makbul Shaikh (Since Deceased Through His Lr'S) v. Shri Abdulsalam Jainoddin Shaikh And ANR.

(8)-CRA-6-14.doc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.6 OF 2014 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.9832 OF 2022 Digitally signed by BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Date:

2022.07.06 09:48:17 +0530 BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Shri. Abdulmannan Makbul Shaikh Since deceased through legal heirs Smt. Tabassum Abdulmannan Shaikh & Ors.

..Applicants

Versus

Shri. Abdulsalam Jainoddin Shaikh & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Surel Shah, for the Applicant No.1(e).

Mr. Ashok Tajane, for the Respondents.

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 4th JULY, 2022 P.C.

1.

Counsel for the applicants has placed on record an undertaking duly signed by applicant No.1(e) - Mr. Hasarat Abdulmannan Shakh for and on behalf of all the applicants, so also consent terms are duly signed by son of the respondent No.1 and claim that he authorized by respondent/father to do so.

2.

The consent terms dated 4th July, 2022 jointly tendered by the parties in Court is taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

3.

Signatories to the consent terms are duly BGP.

(8)-CRA-6-14.doc.

identified by their respective counsels, so also identity and authority of signatories.

4.

A joint request is made that the revision application be disposed of in terms of the consent terms, so also the undertaking tendered on afodavit dated 4th July, 2022 by applicant No.1(e) - Mr. Hasarat Abdulmannan Shaikh.

5.

The present revision application stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms and undertaking. 6.

In view of disposal of revision application, interim application also stands disposed of.

7.

Needless to clarify that both the parties to the consent terms who are signatories are present in Court. [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] BGP.