← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/4154/2021disposed off

Dattatray @ Shashikant Namdev Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra

2023-02-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik2 pages

Diksha Rane

104. BA 4154-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4154/2021 (THROUGH JAIL) Digitally signed by DIKSHA DINESH RANE Date:

2023.02.10 14:43:09 +0530 DIKSHA DINESH RANE Dattatray @ Shashikant Namdev Shinde ..Applicant VS.

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ------------ Adv. Tanvi Sawant a/w. Adv. Shirish Sawant for the Applicant. Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for the State.

HC P. G. Divare, Velapur Police Station, Solapur. ------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 7, 2023.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State.

2.

This is an application for bail in respect of the offence punishable under Sections 302, 307, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereafter 'IPC' for short) read with Sections 3 read with 25 and 38 of the Indian Arms Act, registered vide First Information Report (FIR) No.171/2017 with Velapur Police Station, Solapur. 3.

The applicant was arrested on August 9, 2017. The applicant had absconded. The bail application of the present This order has been corrected pursuant to the order dated 10/2/2023. 1/2

Diksha Rane

104. BA 4154-21.odt applicant was rejected by this Court on February 15, 2019. The Petition (s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).3455/2019 filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court came to be dismissed on April 25, 2019.

4.

I am informed that the trial has commenced and three witnesses have already been examined.

5.

Learned trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and dispose of the same preferably within a period of six (6) months.

6.

Liberty to file fresh application after six months in case trial does not progress substantially.

7.

The application is disposed of.

8.

I express my gratitude for the able assistance rendered by learned counsel Ms. Tanvi Sawant who appeared on behalf of the applicant and argued in support of the applicant's case.

9.

This order be communicated to the applicant through Jail Authorities.

(M. S. KARNIK, J.) This order has been corrected pursuant to the order dated 10/2/2023. 2/2