Sunil Krishna Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra

915.APPP786_2019..doc Vidya Amin.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 786 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1613 OF 2018 Sushil Krushna Jadhav ...

Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent Mr. Aashay Topiwala i/b. Ms. Anjali Patil, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Prashant Jadhav, APP for the respondent/State. CORAM: REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATED: 4th June, 2019 P.C. :

By this Application, the applicant seeks six weeks extension of time to furnish surety as directed by this Court vide order dated 30th July, 2018.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant states that although sureties have been given in the said case, the verification process has not progressed.

3.

Considering the aforesaid, the Application is allowed and accordingly, time to furnish surety, as directed by this Court vide

915.APPP786_2019..doc order dated 30th July, 2018, is extended by a period of six weeks 4.

Application is disposed of.

( REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)