Narayan @ Machindra Saundagar Pandav And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 23-ba.1310.2017 nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1310 OF 2017 1.

Narayan @Machindra Saundagar Pandav 2.

Sunita Narayan @Machindra Pandav ...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr.Sagar Tambe i/b Mr.R.M.Thobde, for the Applicants. Mr.S.S.Hulke, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 24th JULY, 2017 P.C. :

1.

Learned APP states that during the pendency of this application, charge-sheet has been filed as against the applicants. The said statement is accepted.

2.

In view of the statement made by learned APP, the learned counsel for the applicants does not press this application and seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to file an application after filing of the charge-sheet, before the appropriate Court.

2/2 23-ba.1310.2017 3.

Application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

4.

It is made clear, that if an application is filed, after filing of the charge sheet, the same shall be decided by the learned Judge, on its own merits, uninfluenced by the withdrawal of this application. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)