Nandlal Amarchand Shrishrimal v. Vinayak Maroti Sawant And ORS.

3. SA 201 OF 1995.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 201 OF 1995 Nandlal Amarchand Shrishrimal ...Appellant vs.

Vinayak Maroti Sawant and Ors.

...Respondents

***** Adv. Mrunal Surana a/w Mr. Shashikant Surana - Advocate for the Appellant Mr. Pramod Pawar - Advocate for Respondent ***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

06th SEPTEMBER, 2022 P. C. :- 1.

Learned Advocate for the Respondents submitted that even though Respondent No. 1 - Vinayak Sawant has expired, he has got instructions that decree of the possession is executed.

2.

Learned Advocate for the Appellant is unable to make any statement for want of instructions. He has sent letter to the Appellant but it is returned back. Even the Second Appeal stood abated against Respondent No. 2 and stands dismissed against Respondent No. 3. 3.

In view of that nothing remains in the Appeal. Hence it is disposed of.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 1/1 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date: 2022.09.07 18:06:26 +0530