Sachin Rangnath Tathe v. The Honourable Disciplinary Committee, High Court Of Judicature Of Bombay And ANR.

Production-WPST.16358.2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 16358 OF 2016 Sachin s/o. Rangnath Tathe } Petitioner versus The Honourable Disciplinary } Committee and Anr.

} Respondents Mr. Deval K. Anja with Mr. Shripad Jagdale for the petitioner.

Mr. P. S. Dani - Senior Advocate with Ms.Leena Patil for the respondents.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATED :- JUNE 17, 2016 P.C. :- Having heard the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner and perusing the petition with all annexures thereto, we are of the view that once the inquiry against the petitioner before the inquiry officer is in progress, we should not interfere with the same in writ jurisdiction. In the event the final orders in the inquiry are adverse to the petitioner, then, while challenging the same, it is open for the petitioner to raise all contentions including that the inquiry officer was biased and did not treat him fairly and reasonably. Keeping such contentions and of both sides open, we dismiss the petition.

(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA