Pankaj Ramnaresh Saraf v. The State Of Maharashtra

ssm 1 33-appp500.17gp.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 500 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 293 OF 2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 593 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 544 OF 2017 Pankaj Ramnaresh Saraf ....Applicant.

(Intervenor)

IN THE MATTER BETWEENGagan Suri

.....Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents.

Mr. S.R. Karnik for the Applicant.

Ms. Rebecca Gonsolves, Special P.P. for the State. Mr. Kedar Dighe, API, EOW present.

Ms. J.S. Lohokare, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Vikrant Parshurami I/by Ratnesh Dube for the Applicnt in APPLN No. 293 of 2017 and 544 of 2017.

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 22nd MARCH, 2019.

P.C.:- These are the Applications for intervention by the first informant in CR No. 216 of 2013 dated 30th September, 2013, originally registered with MRA Marg Police Station, Mumbai and subsequently investigated by the Economic Offences Wing, Mumbai 1/2

ssm 2 33-appp500.17gp.doc Police having renumbered CR No. 89 of 2013.

For the reasons stated in the Applications, both the Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The Applicants in Criminal Application Nos. 293 of 2017 and 544 of 2017 are directed to implead the first informant Shri Pankaj Saraf as Respondent No.2. Amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today and an amended copy of the Applications be served upon the learned Advocate for the first informant within the same stipulated period.

Both the Applications are allowed in the aforesaid terms. (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2