← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3476/2021allowed to be withdrawn

Rajveer Singh Naruka v. Reserve Bank Of India And ANR

2021-08-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan2 pages

12-WP-3476-2021.doc Shailaja

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3476 OF 2021 Rajveer Singh Naruka ] Petitioner Vs.

Reserve Bank of India and another.] Respondents .....

Mr. Brijesh Pathak, for Petitioner.

Mr. Mayur Bhojwani a/w R. Ajmerwalla i/b MK. Ambalal & Co, for Respondent No.2.

.........

CORAM : K.K. TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.

DATE : 30th AUGUST, 2021.

P.C.

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking direction against respondent No.2 to allow the petitioner to operate his Bank Account No.4445069363.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that during pendency of the present writ petition, the petitioner learnt that the respondent-Bank has frozen his bank SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Date: 2021.09.01 18:10:44 +0530

12-WP-3476-2021.doc account as per the directions of Cyber Cell, Delhi. He submits that the petitioner already made an application before the learned Magistrate at Patiala Dehli as regards de-freezing his bank account in connection with direction issued by Cyber Cell, Delhi. 4.

In view of this subsequent development, he received instructions from his client to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to take appropriate steps in his pending application. To that effect, Advocate on record of the petitioner has given in writing. The same is taken on record and marked ' X' for identification.

5.

In view of these facts, following order is passed; : O R D E R :

(a) Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for;

(b) No order as to costs.

[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [K. K. TATED, J.]