Ramesh Mohan Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 23.1179.15 ba

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1179 OF 2015 Ramesh Mohan Patil .....Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr. Sunny Singh for Applicant Ms. P. P. Shinde APP for the State.

CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 27th JULY 2015 PC :

Heard. Learned APP submits that applicant is arrested in crime no. 212 of 2010 and trial is pending before Dindoshi Court no. 9. Prosecution has examined 3 witnesses. In view of this, applicant does not deserve grant of bail in the midst of trial. Learned counsel appointed for the applicant submits that every accused has a right to expeditious trial. Learned counsel submits that justice delayed is justice denied. He has placed reliance upon the Judgment of Husainara Khatoon Vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar reported in 1979 AIR 1369.

2) However, in the interest of justice, it would not be appropriate to ism

2 23.1179.15 ba release applicant on bail in the midst of trial. Hence, application deserves to be rejected.

3) Learned counsel appointed for the applicant has put in best of efforts to espouse the cause of the applicant. His professional fees are quantified to the tune of Rs. 1000/- to be paid to him within 3 months from today. Application is dismissed. Office to communicate the order to the applicant in jail. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) ism