Majad Ali Sajad Ali Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

59.appln367.16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 367 OF 2016 Majad Ali Sajad Ali Shaikh.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for State.

--- CORAM : SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : APRIL 11, 2017 P.C.:

This is an application through jail seeking the relief of expediting trial. The learned APP upon instructions submits that 8 witnesses have been examined. In view of this, further orders would not be necessary. However, the learned Sessions Judge shall ensure that the accused is produced before the Court on each and every date, failing which the learned Sessions Judge may take appropriate action. The learned Sessions Judge shall also not grant unwarranted Talwalkar 1/2

59.appln367.16.sxw adjournment to the prosecution. The application stands disposed of accordingly.

Office to communicate this order to the applicant who is lodged in Thane Central Prison forthwith.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J) Talwalkar 2/2