Santosh Babanrao Walke v. Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited And ORS.

501-PIL.109.2008 jvs

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

SALUNKE J V CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 109 OF 2008 by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.03.03 10:56:39 +0530 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.76 OF 2009 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 109 OF 2008 Santosh Babanrao Walke ..... Petitioner Vs.

Videsh Sanchar Nigam & Ors.

..... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11346 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11339 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11340 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11347 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11348 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6647 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9163 OF 2009 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.602 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.614 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4341 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4744 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.434 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4342 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.132 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4333 OF 2016

501-PIL.109.2008 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4332 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11464 OF 2015 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4747 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4863 OF 2016 Mr. Sandeep Patade i/b. Mr. Kayval Shah for the petitioner/applicant.

Mr. Anil Wani with Ms. Supriya S. Devergudi i/b. ANS Law Associates for respondent no. 1. Ms. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for State.

CORAM:

S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATE:

MARCH 2, 2023 P.C.:

1.

The praecipe is moved by the respondent no. 1 for speaking to minutes in respect of the order dated 20th February 2023. It is submitted that in para no. 1, the date of notification is typed as "10th August 2005". In fact, the same ought to be "10th August 1925".

2.

The learned advocate for the petitioner is present and accepts the said position.

3.

In light of that, in para 1 of the order dated 20th February 2023, instead of the date "10th August 2005", the same shall be read as "10th August 1925".

4.

The praecipe is disposed of.

(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)