Niti Ratansi Merchant v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

26 apl 629 & 630.14.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.629 OF 2014 Mr. Darius Atta Rafat ....Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra and anr.

.....Respondents with CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.630 OF 2014 Ms. Niti Ratansi Merchant ....Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra and anr.

.....Respondents Mr. Tejas Lumiyo along with Mr. Devendra Avhad i/b. Thodur Law Associates, advocates for the applicants.

Mrs. M. H. Mhatre, APP for the State.

Mr. Pratik Kalantri i/b. Mr. H. E. Palwe, advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 15th JUNE, 2017.

P. C. :

Heard the learned counsel and learned APP appearing for the respective parties.

2.

The applications are filed for quashing and setting-aside MECR No.3 of 2011 registered with Park Site Police Station, Vikhroli, Mumbai.

Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

26 apl 629 & 630.14.doc 3.

Mrs. Mhatre, learned APP, on instructions, makes a statement that the investigation into the subject MECR is completed and, thereafter, "C" Summary Report is filed before the learned Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, 34th Court, Vikhroli, Mumbai, and the same is pending. In support of her contention, she tenders a report dated 15th June, 2017, of the Senior Police Inspector, Park Site Police Station, Mumbai. The said report is taken on record.

4.

In the light of the above, the learned counsel for the applicants fairly concedes that the grievance of the applicants raised in the applications, no more survives. The criminal applications are, accordingly, dismissed.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 2/2