Shabana Beguma v. Union Of India And ANR

Ethape 1 9-BA-1850-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1850 OF 2022 Shabana Beguma ...Applicant

Versus

Union Of India And Anr

...Respondents

....

Ms. Trupti Khamkar a/w Shalaka Hatode i/by Ayan Khan, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Shreeram Shirsat a/w Mr. Amandeep Singh a/w Nishi Singhvi for Respondent - NCB.

Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent - State. by DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE Date: 2022.09.17 10:54:45 +0530 ....

DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER, 2022 PC :

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

The Court was not inclined to grant relief. Learned advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this application. Trial may be expedited.

3.

Learned advocate for respondent submitted that trial is already expedited. The trial has commenced. Prosecution has examined two witnesses. Prosecution proposes to examine about 7 to 8 witnesses and there is every likelihood that the trial would be over within a period of

Ethape 2 9-BA-1850-2022.doc three months.

4.

Since trial has already commenced, it is expected that it would proceed expeditiously.

5.

In view of submission if learned Advocate for applicant, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)