← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5271/1997disposed off

Shri Ranjit Manikchand Shah And ANR. v. East India Paper Company Royal Paper Mart And ORS.

2017-08-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5271 OF 1997 Shri. Ranjit M. Shah and anr.

.. Petitioners vs.

East India Paper Company Royal paper Mart through its Partner N.K. Shahani and ors.

.. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1235 OF 2011 Mr. Rajesh S. Patil for the Petitioners Mr. S.P. Kanuga for Respondent No.1.

CORAM :

M. S. SONAK, J.

DATE : 24 AUGUST 2017.

P.C. :- 1] Mr. Rajesh Patil, learned counsel for the petitioners, on basis of instructions from the petitioners seeks leave to delete respondent Nos.2 to 14 from the array of the respondents in the cause title of the petition. Leave is granted. Necessary amendment to be carried out forthwith.

2] Learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent No.1 hand in Consent Terms, which are taken on record and marked as "X" for purposes of identification.

1/3

3] Learned counsel for the parties request that the petition be disposed of in accordance with the Consent Terms. 4] The Consent Terms have been signed by the two petitioners, who are present in the Court. They state that they have signed this Consent Terms after understanding its full scope and import. 5] The Consent Terms have also been signed by Mr. Kishore Shahani, who is present in the Court. Mr. Kishore Shahani states that he is the partner of respondent No.1 Partnership Firm. Mr. Kishore Shahani states that he has necessary authority to sign this Consent Terms. He states that the amount which respondent No.1 has received has been deposited into the account of the Partnership Firm. He states that the remaining two partners have expressly given him authority to sign this Consent Terms since they also have no objection. He says that if necessary the two partners can also sign this Consent Terms.

6] Mr. Kanuga, learned counsel for respondent No.1, assures this Court that he knows the parties and the statements made by Mr.Kishore Sahani are true and correct.

2/3

7] Mr. Kishore Shahni also states that the Consent Terms have been signed after understanding its full scope and import. 8] In view of the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of in terms of Consent Terms.

9] The pending civil application does not survive and the same is also disposed of.

(M. S. SONAK, J.) 3/3