Khalid Abubakar Baig v. The State Of Maharashtra

4. Cri.BA 1191-2020.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

Digitally signed by Neeta S.

Sawant Date:

2021.01.12 16:46:31 +0530 Neeta S.

Sawant CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Bail Application No. 1191 / 2020 Khalid Abubakar Baig .. Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent **** Ms. Shabana Sothe a/w Mr. Farooq Sothe i/by S.P. Associates, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for State/ Respondent.

Mr. Bajirao Naik, A.P.I., Kurar Police Station. **** CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.

DATE : 12th JANUARY, 2021 P.C. :- Heard.

1.

This is second bail application.

2.

Applicants' frst application was heard on 7th August, 2020; however when Court was not inclined to grant the bail, it was withdrawn.

3.

In support of second bail application, learned Counsel for the 1/2

4. Cri.BA 1191-2020.doc Applicant would contend that since frst application was heard through Video Conferencing, learned Counsel for the Applicant was unable to convince the Court may be due to technical glitches and another submission is that applicant is in the jail for nearly ten months, who is a Doctor by profession, having no criminal antecedents.

4.

In my view, what applicant is seeking, is review of order dated 7th August, 2020, since no change in circumstance were brought to my notice for entertaining the second bail application. 5.

In view of the facts of the case, the learned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible and preferably within six months from today.

6.

In case, the trial is not concluded, applicant may renew his request for his enlargement on bail.

7.

Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) NAJEEB 2/2