Naushad Ali Nishamudin Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

23.ba1192.16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1192 OF 2016 Naushad Ali Nishamudin Shaikh.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Arun Rajput i/b. Ms. Anjali Patil, advocate for Applicant. Mr. R.M. Pethe, APP for State.

--- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 P.C.:

Learned APP at the threshold submits that the trial has commenced and 3 witnesses are examined and hence, the applicant does not deserve to be enlarged on bail in midst of the trial. The learned Counsel for the applicant upon instructions submits that the whereabouts of the victim are not traceable and therefore, the trial is likely to be delayed. Talwalkar 1/2

23.ba1192.16.sxw Learned Sessions Judge shall make an endeavour to conclude the recording of evidence as far as possible within 9 months from the date of receipt of this order. The application stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J) Talwalkar 2/2