← Library
Bombay High CourtAPEAL/726/2005dismissed for nonprosecutiondefault at final hearing stage

Suresh B. Patil v. Bhimrao Pandurang Diwate And ANR.

2024-03-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak2 pages

by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date:

2023.03.03 03:52:52 +0530 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR 15-APEAL-726-2005.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 726 OF 2005 Suresh B. Patil ...Appellant vs.

Bhimrao Pandurang Diwate and Anr.

...Respondents

***** No one is present:- On behalf of the Appellant.

Mr.H.J.Dedhia:- APP for Respondent No.2 - State.

***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

27th MARCH 2024 P. C. :- 1.

It is true that the Appeal is already admitted on 22nd July 2005. I have read the order. The Respondent-Accused has not appeared though served is one of the reasons for granting leave and admission. 2.

However, thereafter the Appellant has become docile. Spare copy was not supplied to the Office for issuing notice. Remarks are there. Since long, the matter was also not listed. We have listed it on 2nd February, 2024. No one was present. Thereafter also, spare copy is not supplied.

3.

Today also, no one is present on behalf of the Appellant. It seems Satish Sangar 1/2

15-APEAL-726-2005.doc that the Appellant has lost interest. The Court has no alternative but to dismiss the Appeal. There is no point in keeping this file alive. 4.

Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for not non compliance. [S. M. MODAK, J.] Satish Sangar 2/2