Vivek Anand v. Anupam Anand

903. civil ia 10006-22.doc R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary) IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10006 OF 2022 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 98 OF 2019 Vivek Anand .. Applicant

Versus

Anupam Anand .. Respondent ....................

 Ms. Madhubala Shetty a/w Gypson John for the Applicant  Mr. Darshan R. Mehta i/by M/s. Dhruve Liladhar & Co for the Respondent ...................

CORAM

: K. R. SHRIRAM & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 30, 2022 P.C.

:

1.

Ms. Shetty appearing for applicant states that interim application is for restoration of family court appeal which came to be dismissed for default but the interim application is shown inadvertently under caption "for withdrawal".

2.

We have considered the averments in the application. For reasons mentioned therein, appeal is restored to file. 3.

Interim application stands disposed.

4.

Family court appeal to come up for hearing in due course. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ K. R. SHRIRAM, J.] Digitally signed by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date:

2022.07.01 11:06:53 +0530 RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR