Vishal Vitthal Tupe v. The State Of Maharashtra

Sherla V.

aba.896.2015_902.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.896 OF 2015 Vishal Vitthal Tupe ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.Niranjan Mundargi i/b Harshwardhan Akolkar for the Applicant Mr.Arfan Sait, APP, for Respondent - State Mr.S.S. Kadam, Investigating Officer / P.I., Pune City Traffic Branch, present CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATE: JULY 29, 2015 P.C.:

1.

This Anticipatory Bail Application is filed as the applicant/accused apprehends arrest under sections 302, 326, 324, 325, 427, 452, 120B, 143, 147, 148, 149, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code in C.R. No.30 of 2011 registered with the Chakan police station, Pune. 2.

The learned Prosecutor informs that Court that though the offence is registered in 2011, the applicant/accused is absconding. 3.

The learned Counsel for the applicant/accused informs the Court that he was available from 2011 till today in the same village and his marriage was also performed in the year 2012 in the same village. However, the learned Prosecutor has produced the order passed by the 1 / 2

aba.896.2015_902.doc learned JMFC, Khed of issuance of proclamation under section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code on 22.3.2011.

4.

As the applicant/accused is a proclaimed offender, this application for anticipatory bail cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is rejected. The interim protection granted earlier stands vacated.

(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) 2 / 2