Mohd. Saeed S/O. Mohd. Hanif Sayed v. Sayed Mohd. Tamim Abdul Subhan And ORS

1005.14-caa FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1005 OF 2014 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO.17190 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. S. S. Redekar for the Applicant Mr. Parvinder Singh Sethi for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Santosh Pathak for Respondent No.3.

CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATE : JUNE 15, 2015 P.C.:

1.

Heard. This Application is preferred by the Plaintiff for condonation of 20 days delay in filing the Appeal from Order challenging the order dated 15/05/2014 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court, Mumbai in draft Notice of Motion in Suit No.3894/2013.

2.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Applicant and the averments made in the Application, I am satisfied that the Applicant has made out a case for allowing the present Civil Application.

Basavraj G Patil 1/2

1005.14-caa 3.

Hence, the following order:

a) Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which read thus:

a.

The delay of 20 days in filing the Appeal from Order be condoned.

b) Rule made absolute accordingly.

JUDGE Basavraj G Patil 2/2