Sou.Shahanaj Tayyubpasha Shaikh v. Tayyubpasha Hanif Shaikh

41.123.20 mca.doc ISM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2020 Shahanaj Tayyubpasha Shaikh ....Applicant V/s.

Tayyubpasha Hanif Shaikh .....Respondent Mr. S. P. Rajepandhare for the Applicant CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE:

FEBRUARY 4, 2021.

P.C.:

1] Though served, none appears for non-applicant. Marriage was solemnized on 16/02/2014. Couple is blessed with son Arish who is in the custody of the Applicant. Citing the aforesaid issue, prayer for transfer is made.

2] Though served, none appears for non-applicant. As the contents in the Application are not controverted, considering the fact that Applicant is custodian of the minor children, Application is 1/2

41.123.20 mca.doc allowed in terms of prayer clause (A).

3] Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] 2/2