Pandurang Pundlik Ahire v. State Of Maha. Thr. Gp And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10106 OF 2023 Mrs.Mangala Ashok Kharjul ...
Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10107 OF 2023 Mr.Ramdas Shrihari Ghumre ...
Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10117 OF 2023 Mr.Narayan Laxman Jadhav ...
Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10118 OF 2023 Mr. Sampat Ramchandra Vatpade ...
Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10119 OF 2023 Mr. Bhushan Jibhavu Gaikwad (Patil) ...
Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...
Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10124 OF 2023 Mr. Jibhavu Sada Gaikwad (Patil) ...
Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10125 OF 2023 Mr.Dattatray Kachru Aher ...
Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10128 OF 2023 Mr.Yadav Mhashu Niphade ...
Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10307 OF 2023 Mr.Pandurang Pundlik Ahire ...
Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...
Respondents ......
Mr. Ajinkya Taskar i/b. Mr.Narayan G. Rokade for the Petitioner in all Petitions.
Ms. R.A.Salunkhe, AGP for the State- Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in all Petitions except WP No. 10117 of 2023.
Mr. N.K.Rajpurohit, AGP for the State- Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in WP No. 10117 of 2023.
......
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & SMT. MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 21 AUGUST 2023 P.C.:
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2.
For the relief that is sought and the order that is proposed to be passed, we do not deem it necessary to issue notice to the concerned Co-operative Society. 3.
The Petitioners have stated that they have availed a loan from the concerned Co-operative Society. According to them, the loan was for agricultural purpose. They seek benefit of Section 44A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and they have made certain representations in respect of the same. The main grievance is that their representations are not being decided. 4.
We proceed on the basis, as informed by the Petitioners, that representations are pending and not yet decided. Without going into the question whether the Petitioners are entitled to the benefit of Section 44A or not, which will have to be decided by the concerned Respondents and the Society, we dispose of the petitions directing that the representation of the Petitioners be decided within a period of eight weeks subject to earlier time bound commitments and pressing public duties of the concerned Respondents.
5.
We once again make it clear that as to what decision is to be taken on the representations is left to the Society/Respondent concerned, who will take a decision as per law. The Writ Petitions are disposed of.
(SMT. MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) by JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR Date:
2023.08.22 11:17:06 +0530 JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR