Geeta Surendra Vaidya v. Surendra Dattatraya Vaidya

fca88 ssp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.88 OF 2008 Geeta Surendra Vaidya ...Appellant vs.

Surendra Dattatraya Vaidya

...Respondent

Mr.K.S.Patil for the appellant Mr.R.R.Salvi for the respondent CORAM : A.S.OKA, & A.K.MENON, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 16, 2015 P.C.:

The learned counsel for the parties have tendered consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked `X' for identification. The learned counsel for the parties state that both the appellant and the respondent have signed the consent terms and that even both of them have signed the consent terms as Advocates.

On instructions, the learned counsel appearing for both the parties state that since the year 2009, the parties have resumed co-habitation and since then, they are happily living together as wife and husband.

Hence, we dispose of the petition by passing the following order:

(I) Impugned Judgment and decree dated 15th April 2004 passed by the Family Court, Bandra,

fca88 Mumbai in Petition No.A-659/2004 is hereby set aside;

(II) The statements and undertakings in the consent terms are accepted;

(III) In view of the consent terms, Petition No.A-659/2004 hereby stands dismissed;

(IV) Appeal is disposed of on above terms;

(V) There will be no order as to costs.

(A.K.MENON,J.) (A.S.OKA,J.)