The Godavari Marathwada Irrigaiton Development Corporation v. The State Of Maharashtra And Othrs

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 680 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 682 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 683 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 684 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 685 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 686 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 688 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 693 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 695 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 699 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 700 OF 2012 The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation ..Appellant versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..Respondents Ms Chaitrali Deshmukh for Appellant - Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation.

Ms A. A. Takalkar - AGP for the State.

Mr. P. J. Ahuja for Respondents - Claimants.

1/3

CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J.

(HEAD OF THE PANEL) : C.D. GONGLE, RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE, MEMBER & :

M.S. GUPTA, REGISTRAR (INSP.II.) MEMBER DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER, 2017.

P.C. :- 1] The learned counsel for the parties hand in consent terms, which are taken on record and marked as 'X' for the purposes of identification.

2] The consent terms have been signed by the Advocate for the appellant, the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the learned AGP. The consent terms are also signed / bear the thumb impressions of the respondents - claimants. The signatures / thumb impressions have been duly identified by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents claimants. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents- claimants has also signed these consent terms signifying consent.

3] In terms of the consent terms, the appellant, has agreed to honour the Award made by the Reference Court and consequently, withdraw the appeals.

4] In these cases, the respondents - claimants have not filed 2/3

cross appeals / cross objections and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents / claimants state that they have no intentions to do so.

5] In case there is any issue of withdrawal of compensation amount, the Reference Court is directed to verify the identity of the claimants / legal representatives, if any, at the stage of permitting withdrawal. Necessary endorsement to be made in that regard at the stage of permitting withdrawal.

6] The appellant shall be entitled to refund of court fees in terms of the Rules as permissible.

7] The appeals are disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Necessary awards to be drawn in terms of the consent terms. 8] Since the appeals are now disposed of, the pending civil applications, if any, do not survive and the same are also disposed of. (M.S. SONAK,J.) HEAD OF THE PANEL (C.D. GONGLE) MEMBER (M.S. GUPTA) chandka MEMBER 3/3