Ravi Murty Kannan Tevar v. The State Of Maharashtra

16.ba1238.16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1238 OF 2016 Ravi Murthy Kannan Tevar.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Mooman Hasanali Ebrahim, advocate for Applicant. Ms. J.S. Lohakare, APP for State.

--- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J DATE : JANUARY 11, 2017 P.C.:

The learned Counsel for the applicant fairly submits that in the present case i.e. in MCOC Case No. 15/12, the prosecution has examined as many as 11 witnesses. Hence, it would not be appropriate to consider the application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in the midst of the trial. In view of this, the learned Counsel upon instructions seeks liberty to withdraw the application. Liberty as prayed for is granted in the interest of justice. Talwalkar 1/2

16.ba1238.16.sxw The Special Judge shall make every endeavour to conduct the trial as expeditiously as possible and not grant unwarranted adjournments to the prosecution and to the defence.

The application stands dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) Talwalkar 2/2