Manoj Laxman Choudhari And ANR v. Vinod Pralhad Choudhari

1125 arp 95 of 2017 .doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.95 OF 2017 Manoj Laxman Choudhari and Anr.

...

Petitioners versus Vinod Pralhad Choudhari ...

Respondent Mr. Tushar N. Sonawane for Petitioners.

Mr J.S.

Yadav I/by Mr. B.P.Shukla, for Respondent.

CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.

DATE: 10th AUGUST, 2018 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties and the following order is passed by consent :

(i) Mr. Rohan Kadam, Advocate is appointed as the sole Arbitrator to decide the disputes between the parties arising out of the Supplementary Deed of Partnership dated 30-10-2012 and Memorandum of Understanding dated 04-02-2015. (ii)The disclosure of Mr. Rohan Kadam, Advocate under Section 11 (8) read with Section 12 (1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended by the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (3 of 2016) is taken on record.

(iii)The parties shall appear before the learned Arbitrator in his chambers, on 21 st August, 2018 at 5.00 p.m. and obtain necessary directions. ssp 1/2

1125 arp 95 of 2017 .doc (iv)The learned Arbitrator shall endeavour to pass his final Award within a period of six months from the date of this order. (v) The learned Arbitrator shall not grant adjournments to the parties unless absolutely necessary.

(vi) All contentions of the parties are kept open. (vii) The cost of arbitration shall initially be borne by the parties equally. (viii) The venue of Arbitration shall be at Mumbai. (ix)In view of this order, the above Arbitration Petition is disposed of. ( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ) by Swaroop Sharad Phadke Date:

2018.08.13 15:33:02 +0530 Swaroop Sharad Phadke ssp 2/2