Nagraj Sudam Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra

37.appln392.16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 392 OF 2016 Nagraj Sudam Shinde.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Veerdhaval Kakade, advocate for applicant. Ms. Anamika Malhotra, APP for State.

--- CORAM : SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : APRIL 7, 2017 P.C.:

This is an application through jail seeking relief of expeditious trial in Sessions Case No. 35 of 2015. The learned APP upon instructions submits that the applicant has been convicted. In view of this, no orders are necessary. The application stands disposed of accordingly.

Talwalkar 1/2

37.appln392.16.sxw Learned Counsel appointed for the applicant has put in his best of efforts to espouse the cause of applicant. The professional fees are quantified as per rule to be paid to the learned Counsel within 3 months from today.

Office to communicate this order to the applicant who is in jail. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J) Talwalkar 2/2