Ravindra Mohanlal Suchak v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

(14)ABA-1756-2022.doc rkmore

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1756 OF 2022 Ravindra Mohanlal Suchak ] ..

Applicant vs.

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

] ..

Respondents Ms.Rajeshwari Bapat Sarkar, for Applicant.

Smt.A.A. Takalkar, APP for State.

PI Mr. B.R. Pawar, present.

CORAM :

BHARATI DANGRE, J DATE :

28TH JULY, 2022.

P.C.

Digitally signed by RAJSHREE KISHOR MORE Date:

2022.07.28 19:55:07 +0530 1] The applicant is apprehending his arrest in RCC No.343/2005 RAJSHREE KISHOR MORE which came to be registered on the basis of a private complaint filed by the widow of the deceased, which resulted in invoking Section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. JMFC Kalyan in 2007 and to be precise on 12.06.2007 issued process against accused Nos.1 to 6. The said order was challenged by filing Criminal Revision Application, which was allowed and the applicant came to be discharged. Subsequent thereto Criminal Writ Petition was filed in this Court in the year 2010 by the original complainant claiming that discharge order could not have been passed in the said proceedings. Resultantly, the High Court set aside the said order by necessarily setting aside the discharge order and case was directed to be proceeded in accordance with law. 1/2

(14)ABA-1756-2022.doc 2] This order being passed in 2010 for around a decade the sessions case is walking in its feet.

3] In the background of the aforesaid sequence of events, the Investigating Officer who is present in the Court state that custodial interrogation of the applicant is not warranted. 4] In the wake of above, the applicant is entitled to following order : (a) Application is allowed.

(b) In the event of arrest in connection with R.C.C. No.343/2005 registered with Manpada Police Station, the applicant Ravindra Mohanlal Sucak shall be released on bail on furnishing P.R. bond to the extent of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties of the like amount.

(c) The applicant shall attend the trial regularly. (d) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police Officer and should not tamper with evidence. [BHARATI DANGRE, J] 2/2