Nand Premsagar Deokota v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

ssm 1 30-app384.18gp.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 384 OF 2018 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2030 OF 2016 Rajesh Chandrashekar Dube .....Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent.

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 706 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 384 OF 2018 Nand Premsagar Deokota ...Applicant (Intervenor)

IN THE MATTER BETWEENRajesh Chandrashekar Dube

.....Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent.

Mr. R.R. Varma for the Applicant in APPP 384 of 2018 Mr. M.G. Patil APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Aniket Vagal for the intervenor.

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 19th JULY, 2018.

P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, the learned counsel for the intervenor and the learned APP. The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant submitted 1/2

ssm 2 30-app384.18gp.doc that, the Applicant has drawn Demand Drafts totalling of Rs.22,00,000/- in the name of wife of the Complainant namely Mrs. Shraddha Patel. The said Demand Drafts are handed over in the custody of Shri. Nand Deokota, the first informant/complainant in the present crime. He acknowledged the said on behalf of his wife Mrs. Shraddha Patel. The photocopy of the Demand Drafts along with the acknowledgement of Shri. Nand Deokota, the first informant/ complainant is taken on record.

In view of the above, the Application No. 384 of 2018 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

In view of the order passed in the Application No. 384 of 2018, Application No.706 of 2018 does not survive and is accordingly disposed off.

(A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2